The Existing Concept of Leadership in the African Church

Ted W. Engstrom and Edward R. Dayton in their book, “The Art of Management for Christian Leaders” said that administration can be taken a gander at from various holy messengers. They proceeded to state three of these points from which authority can be taken a gander at. They are: I ) from the perspective of position, for e.g., heads of organizations or associations; ii) from the perspective of activity: pioneers are known by the administration acts they perform. Despite the various perspectives from which one could look at authority, it will consistently fall under three essential concepts.1

The three fundamental ideas of administration distinguished in the contemporary world are as per the following: the customary idea – from one’s social or ethnic foundation, the mainstream idea from the view purpose of present day culture all in all and the scriptural idea – from the lessons of sacred writing. Now and again, the customary idea. Nonetheless, in the African setting, it is imperative to make the qualification. From the three ideas referenced over, any remaining ideas of administration have their foundations. Accordingly in talking about the current ideas of administration in the African church, these three ideas were inspected. The organization continued in this part is as per the following: the principal segment was a conversation on the Biblical idea of initiative, the second a conversation on the mainstream idea of authority and the third on the customary idea of administration. Following these conversations, the current idea of initiative, inside the African church was dictated by contrasting these ideas and real practices in the congregation. From the examination an end is drawn.

The Biblical Concept of Leadership

The idea of initiative from the scriptural point of view has been resolved from the educating of sacred texts and from the instances of numerous who were called to administration by God. In this part, the administration lessons of Jesus and the life. The existence he displayed as the ideal norm for Christian pioneers will be analyzed. Following that, initiative ideas in the Old Testament will be talked about for the most part, yet in addition making explicit references.

A. Administration Teachings of Jesus

In his book, “The New Leaders: A Revolutionary Approach”, Mytron Rush expressed his motivation of composing as, “to assist us with rediscovering the practices and standards of administration thought as applied by Jesus”, He said that Jesus Christ was not simply substance to have devotees. By His lessons and practices, He re-imagined compelling initiative as the pioneer duplicating himself on the followers.2 during the time spent imitating pioneer, Jesus uncovered His fundamental idea of administration as that of administration. Gottfried Osei-Mensah concurs with Myron Rush when he said, “the model of administration the sacred text reliably order to individuals of God is rather what we may call the worker Ieader”.3 Several sections of sacred writing can likewise be refered to help the way that Jesus’ idea of initiative was that of administration. In Matthew 20:25-27, following a solicitation for high position made by the mother of two of Jesus’ devotees, Jesus offered this expression: “Not so with you. All things considered, whosoever needs to be incredible should be your worker, and whoever needs to be first should be your slave.” Also in Matthew 20:28, Jesus said, “The Son of man didn’t come to be served however to serve”. Osei-Mensah saw that through His service, and particularly in His relationship with His devotees, Jesus additionally reliably displayed this sort of administration. For instance, when Jesus washed the followers’ feet, He unmistakably exhibited this rule of humble assistance and show that it doesn’t remove any poise from the pioneer. It was this worker idea of authority, which was encapsulated in the life and service of Jesus that created the primary gathering of Christian pioneers – the pupils of Jesus. This demonstration of Jesus was additionally to show the devotees that genuine initiative is grounded in affection, which should bring about assistance.

B. Authority lessons of Jesus’ Disciples

Sacred text shows that long after Jesus had gone, His pupils carried on His idea of initiative. The missionary Peter in I Peter 5:2-5 kept in touch with other Christian pioneers: “Be worker of God’s rush that are under your consideration, filling in as administrators not on the grounds that you should, but since you are willing. Dress yourself with modesty toward each other.” In this proclamation of the messenger Peter, it tends to be seen that his idea of administration is absolutely that of administration. He didn’t just acknowledge this idea as that of Jesus however considered it to be the standard for Christian pioneers. Therefore, he was educating them to embrace a similar idea of initiative. Likewise, the witness Paul, in I Thessalonians 2:9 discussed the sort of pioneer he had been to the Thessalonians. He said he toiled night and day among them and that his life and that of his associates were instances of sacredness, equity and irreproachability before God. Paul’s idea of administration was actually that of Jesus – administration. The Thessalonians were not serving him, yet rather he served them.

Disregarding the way that in the New Testament, pioneers consider themselves to be as workers, yet administrative roles are likewise recognized. In his composition, Paul taught both Timothy and Titus to name seniors in the nearby holy places. In any case, the New Testament zeroed in on the demonstration of administration of the pioneer and not on the workplace the involved.

C. Administration Concept in The Old Testament

It very well may be seen from the Old Testament that all the pioneers that God utilized were by and by called to their individual workplaces. Also, every single one of them was given their particular service at the point they were picked. This was most likely a sign that God needed them to zero in on help instead of their positions. For instance, in Exodus 3:1-10, when God called Moses, He gave him clear guidance with regards to what He needed him to do. In section 10, He says “… I’m sending you to Pharaoh to bring my kin the Israelites out of Egypt”. At the point when Moses left Median for Egypt, his emphasis was never on his new position, yet rather on the assignment he needed to perform. Another model is that of Nehemiah. In his book, “Greatness in Leadership”, John White offered the accompanying expression: “In this way the book of Nehemiah serves essentially to unfurl for us a player in God’s on-going arrangement for His kin. Yet, consistently it is the man, his character and his authority that holds my advantage. I present these reflections with the expectation that they will help Christians youthful and old who face initiative responsibilities”.4 John White was not worried about Nehemiah’s post as lead representative, but instead on what he did. From the main part of the book of Nehemiah, Nehemiah had been worried about serving and he never wandered from that concentration all through the record. At whatever point chief embraces this idea of administration, for instance, on account of Nehemiah the pioneer can achieve his objective.

The Secular Concept of Leadership

As the name infers, the common idea of authority is by and large utilized in non-strict associations and establishments. The Bible causes reference to this idea of initiative and various creators who to have examined it, bring up its points of interest and hindrances. The mainstream ideas of administration will along these lines be examined from the scriptural and common perspective.

Article Source:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *